<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, What is Better For Traffic Information?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earthissquare.com/2009/09/03/so-what-is-better-for-traffic-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earthissquare.com/2009/09/03/so-what-is-better-for-traffic-information/</link>
	<description>Bordering on Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:43:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: So, What is Better For Traffic Information? - Community Mashup - The GIS Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.earthissquare.com/2009/09/03/so-what-is-better-for-traffic-information/comment-page-1/#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>So, What is Better For Traffic Information? - Community Mashup - The GIS Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earthissquare.com/?p=1802#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>[...] September 2009 (42)August 2009 (430)July 2009 (489)June 2009 (399)May 2009 (382)April 2009 (426)March 2009 (464)February 2009 (518)January 2009 (245)December 2008 (50)November 2008 (50)October 2008 (17)September 2008 (10)August 2008 (11)July 2008 (18)June 2008 (8)May 2008 (13)April 2008 (3)March 2008 (5)July 2007 (1)April 2007 (1)February 2007 (1)August 2006 (1)March 2006 (1)July 2005 (2)           I know we have seen the latest and greatest and how it will be the best&#8230; but I honestly do not think the crowd sourcing traffic information is the best option out there. It just depends on too many variables to fall into place, and people needed Read More... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September 2009 (42)August 2009 (430)July 2009 (489)June 2009 (399)May 2009 (382)April 2009 (426)March 2009 (464)February 2009 (518)January 2009 (245)December 2008 (50)November 2008 (50)October 2008 (17)September 2008 (10)August 2008 (11)July 2008 (18)June 2008 (8)May 2008 (13)April 2008 (3)March 2008 (5)July 2007 (1)April 2007 (1)February 2007 (1)August 2006 (1)March 2006 (1)July 2005 (2)           I know we have seen the latest and greatest and how it will be the best&#8230; but I honestly do not think the crowd sourcing traffic information is the best option out there. It just depends on too many variables to fall into place, and people needed Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
